Marlinda Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Marlinda?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Marlinda would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity RANKING of #2,628 in 1958.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 1969 with 21 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Marlinda in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Approximately during the years 1954-1958, and 1974-1977 the name Marlinda took a definitive turn upwards in popularity.
Marlinda's popularity has been moving downward for some time. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Marlinda has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Marlinda?
Currently, the name is at a low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Marlinda is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Marlinda (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | 6 | 13,504 | |
1997 | 9 | 9,523 | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | 7 | 11,294 | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | 5 | 14,889 | |
1992 | 7 | 11,235 | |
1991 | 5 | 14,528 | |
1990 | 7 | 10,926 | |
1989 | 9 | 8,477 | |
1988 | 5 | 13,079 | |
1987 | 12 | 6,186 | |
1986 | 9 | 7,498 | |
1985 | 9 | 7,326 | |
1984 | 10 | 6,578 | |
1983 | 6 | 9,761 | |
1982 | 11 | 6,186 | |
1981 | 8 | 7,845 | |
1980 | 12 | 5,762 | |
1979 | 13 | 5,285 | |
1978 | 15 | 4,582 | |
1977 | 16 | 4,341 | |
1976 | 11 | 5,440 | |
1975 | 12 | 5,037 | |
1974 | 12 | 4,905 | |
1973 | 11 | 5,070 | |
1972 | 6 | 7,858 | |
1971 | 18 | 3,597 | |
1970 | 12 | 4,664 | |
1969 | 21 | 2,974 | |
1968 | 9 | 5,011 | |
1967 | 13 | 3,773 | |
1966 | 11 | 4,111 | |
1965 | 13 | 3,664 | |
1964 | 13 | 3,817 | |
1963 | 17 | 3,141 | |
1962 | 18 | 2,991 | |
1961 | 13 | 3,716 | |
1960 | 17 | 3,058 | |
1959 | 20 | 2,643 | |
1958 | 20 | 2,628 | |
1957 | 14 | 3,246 | |
1956 | 13 | 3,447 | |
1955 | 15 | 3,054 | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | 8 | 4,454 | |
1952 | 7 | 4,772 | |
1951 | 6 | 5,212 | |
1950 | 7 | 4,591 | |
1949 | 9 | 3,790 | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | 7 | 4,620 | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | 5 | 5,104 | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |