Julita Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Julita?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Julita would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity RANKING of #3,629 in 1934.
However, the name was bestowed upon the greatest number of babies in 1970 with 11 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Julita in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Julita's popularity has remained mostly unchanged for some time. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Julita has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Julita?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a mid point.
The name Julita is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Julita (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | 5 | 13,954 | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | 5 | 12,666 | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | 5 | 11,414 | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | 8 | 7,769 | |
1981 | 11 | 6,061 | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | 10 | 6,134 | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | 8 | 6,319 | |
1972 | 5 | 8,822 | |
1971 | 8 | 6,265 | |
1970 | 11 | 4,885 | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | 10 | 4,432 | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | 5 | 6,998 | |
1961 | 9 | 4,690 | |
1960 | 6 | 5,995 | |
1959 | 7 | 5,278 | |
1958 | 8 | 4,695 | |
1957 | 8 | 4,696 | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | 6 | 5,497 | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | 6 | 5,342 | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | 5 | 5,791 | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | 5 | 5,691 | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | 7 | 3,629 | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | 6 | 4,296 | |
1929 | 6 | 4,322 | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | 5 | 5,239 | |
1925 | 5 | 5,385 | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |