Jamaar Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Jamaar?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Jamaar would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #1498 was reached in 1982 with 42 occurrences.
The least number of children given the name Jamaar was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Approximately during the years 1975-1982, and 2005-2008, the name Jamaar took a definitive turn upwards in popularity whereas 1986-1990 were years of successive downward movement.
For a number of years, the name Jamaar has been moving downward in popularity. , continuing the trend, the number of children named Jamaar lately has dropped significantly.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Jamaar?
Currently, the name is at a very low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Jamaar is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Relative to what it once was, Jamaar has fallen out of favor as a given name.
Jamaar (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | 8 | 9,165 | |
2016 | 5 | 12,994 | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | 8 | 9,116 | |
2013 | 8 | 9,134 | |
2012 | 10 | 7,774 | |
2011 | 8 | 9,097 | |
2010 | 9 | 8,387 | |
2009 | 11 | 7,419 | |
2008 | 15 | 5,889 | |
2007 | 11 | 7,295 | |
2006 | 11 | 7,127 | |
2005 | 11 | 6,829 | |
2004 | 13 | 5,941 | |
2003 | 8 | 8,154 | |
2002 | 7 | 8,847 | |
2001 | 11 | 6,188 | |
2000 | 8 | 7,757 | |
1999 | 8 | 7,447 | |
1998 | 7 | 7,931 | |
1997 | 6 | 8,605 | |
1996 | 7 | 7,463 | |
1995 | 9 | 6,121 | |
1994 | 12 | 4,919 | |
1993 | 12 | 4,829 | |
1992 | 14 | 4,206 | |
1991 | 17 | 3,527 | |
1990 | 11 | 4,811 | |
1989 | 23 | 2,728 | |
1988 | 21 | 2,717 | |
1987 | 21 | 2,594 | |
1986 | 30 | 1,982 | |
1985 | 20 | 2,542 | |
1984 | 31 | 1,811 | |
1983 | 34 | 1,697 | |
1982 | 42 | 1,498 | |
1981 | 25 | 2,108 | |
1980 | 22 | 2,307 | |
1979 | 18 | 2,625 | |
1978 | 15 | 2,849 | |
1977 | 16 | 2,716 | |
1976 | 11 | 3,360 | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | 6 | 4,674 | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |