Jacqualyn Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Jacqualyn?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Jacqualyn would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity ranking of #1,740 in 1950 with 30 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Jacqualyn was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Approximately during the years 1940-1943, 1947-1950, and 1986-1989, the name Jacqualyn took a definitive turn upwards in popularity whereas unequivocal downward movement occurred about 1953-1956, and 1994-1997.
Jacqualyn's popularity has steadily decreased for some time. Of late however, the number of parents selecting the name Jacqualyn for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Jacqualyn?
Currently, the name is at a very low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Jacqualyn is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Jacqualy. (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | 7 | 14,498 | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | 7 | 13,286 | |
2003 | 9 | 10,760 | |
2002 | 10 | 9,776 | |
2001 | 12 | 8,402 | |
2000 | 16 | 6,604 | |
1999 | 14 | 6,977 | |
1998 | 9 | 9,584 | |
1997 | 10 | 8,594 | |
1996 | 19 | 5,145 | |
1995 | 18 | 5,290 | |
1994 | 24 | 4,293 | |
1993 | 21 | 4,720 | |
1992 | 16 | 5,830 | |
1991 | 15 | 6,056 | |
1990 | 25 | 4,045 | |
1989 | 23 | 4,164 | |
1988 | 14 | 5,711 | |
1987 | 17 | 4,728 | |
1986 | 13 | 5,550 | |
1985 | 16 | 4,711 | |
1984 | 20 | 3,906 | |
1983 | 16 | 4,545 | |
1982 | 16 | 4,584 | |
1981 | 21 | 3,778 | |
1980 | 21 | 3,761 | |
1979 | 12 | 5,533 | |
1978 | 9 | 6,587 | |
1977 | 11 | 5,634 | |
1976 | 5 | 9,836 | |
1975 | 8 | 6,741 | |
1974 | 7 | 7,161 | |
1973 | 6 | 7,778 | |
1972 | 6 | 7,615 | |
1971 | 6 | 7,730 | |
1970 | 14 | 4,118 | |
1969 | 11 | 4,537 | |
1968 | 13 | 3,869 | |
1967 | 9 | 4,741 | |
1966 | 11 | 4,048 | |
1965 | 13 | 3,624 | |
1964 | 11 | 4,196 | |
1963 | 9 | 4,674 | |
1962 | 10 | 4,366 | |
1961 | 18 | 3,005 | |
1960 | 11 | 4,009 | |
1959 | 7 | 5,237 | |
1958 | 18 | 2,794 | |
1957 | 18 | 2,767 | |
1956 | 10 | 4,018 | |
1955 | 15 | 3,026 | |
1954 | 18 | 2,634 | |
1953 | 26 | 2,046 | |
1952 | 26 | 1,993 | |
1951 | 18 | 2,421 | |
1950 | 30 | 1,740 | |
1949 | 17 | 2,456 | |
1948 | 23 | 2,036 | |
1947 | 22 | 2,108 | |
1946 | 25 | 1,829 | |
1945 | 10 | 3,000 | |
1944 | 14 | 2,450 | |
1943 | 22 | 1,860 | |
1942 | 11 | 2,890 | |
1941 | 10 | 2,930 | |
1940 | 9 | 3,068 | |
1939 | 9 | 3,009 | |
1938 | 10 | 2,816 | |
1937 | 11 | 2,618 | |
1936 | 12 | 2,436 | |
1935 | 10 | 2,822 | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | 9 | 2,991 | |
1932 | 8 | 3,419 | |
1931 | 8 | 3,341 | |
1930 | 7 | 3,838 | |
1929 | 11 | 2,821 | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |