Haskel Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Haskel?
Less than 5 babies were given the name Haskel in the United States in 2018.Haskel, is a possible choice for parents seeking a more unique name.
Its highest popularity ranking of #1146 was reached in 1924 with 40 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Haskel was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Approximately during the years 1910-1915 the name Haskel took a definitive turn upwards in popularity.
Where is the name Haskel popularity headed?
Currently, the name is at a very low point when compared to its most popular year.
For a number of years, the name Haskel has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Haskel for their newborn has remained about the same.
The name Haskel is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Relative to what it once was, Haskel has fallen out of favor as a given name.
Haskel (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | 5 | 11,187 | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | 5 | 8,920 | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | 5 | 6,633 | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | 6 | 5,338 | |
1977 | 5 | 6,219 | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | 6 | 5,045 | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | 7 | 4,155 | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | 5 | 5,010 | |
1969 | 7 | 3,732 | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | 11 | 2,535 | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | 8 | 3,086 | |
1964 | 5 | 4,271 | |
1963 | 8 | 3,161 | |
1962 | 6 | 3,802 | |
1961 | 9 | 2,985 | |
1960 | 6 | 3,823 | |
1959 | 7 | 3,409 | |
1958 | 14 | 2,208 | |
1957 | 8 | 3,114 | |
1956 | 12 | 2,418 | |
1955 | 7 | 3,314 | |
1954 | 6 | 3,612 | |
1953 | 15 | 2,069 | |
1952 | 15 | 2,038 | |
1951 | 17 | 1,866 | |
1950 | 16 | 1,912 | |
1949 | 12 | 2,271 | |
1948 | 12 | 2,266 | |
1947 | 11 | 2,427 | |
1946 | 15 | 1,916 | |
1945 | 15 | 1,817 | |
1944 | 16 | 1,773 | |
1943 | 20 | 1,605 | |
1942 | 20 | 1,602 | |
1941 | 16 | 1,789 | |
1940 | 17 | 1,710 | |
1939 | 24 | 1,372 | |
1938 | 26 | 1,320 | |
1937 | 26 | 1,316 | |
1936 | 27 | 1,280 | |
1935 | 24 | 1,407 | |
1934 | 18 | 1,693 | |
1933 | 26 | 1,320 | |
1932 | 21 | 1,558 | |
1931 | 33 | 1,201 | |
1930 | 32 | 1,265 | |
1929 | 33 | 1,226 | |
1928 | 34 | 1,239 | |
1927 | 25 | 1,538 | |
1926 | 28 | 1,390 | |
1925 | 31 | 1,316 | |
1924 | 40 | 1,146 | |
1923 | 29 | 1,370 | |
1922 | 36 | 1,211 | |
1921 | 31 | 1,343 | |
1920 | 31 | 1,307 | |
1919 | 26 | 1,425 | |
1918 | 28 | 1,359 | |
1917 | 26 | 1,380 | |
1916 | 28 | 1,283 | |
1915 | 31 | 1,169 | |
1914 | 17 | 1,517 | |
1913 | 13 | 1,536 | |
1912 | 15 | 1,240 | |
1911 | 9 | 1,229 | |
1910 | 5 | 1,697 | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | 7 | 1,152 | |
1907 | 5 | 1,427 | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |