Gillermo Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Gillermo?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Gillermo would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity RANKING of #2,190 in 1972.
However, the name was bestowed upon the greatest number of babies in 1993 with 21 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Gillermo in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Decidely upward trends in the number of babies given the name Gillermo occurred roughly during the years 1969-1972, and 1990-1992.
Gillermo's popularity has been spiralling downward for some time. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Gillermo has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Gillermo?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a low point.
The name Gillermo is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Gillermo (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | 5 | 12,929 | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | 5 | 13,113 | |
2008 | 7 | 10,229 | |
2007 | 6 | 11,403 | |
2006 | 5 | 12,683 | |
2005 | 6 | 10,548 | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | 8 | 8,098 | |
2002 | 10 | 6,704 | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | 7 | 8,499 | |
1999 | 16 | 4,423 | |
1998 | 21 | 3,534 | |
1997 | 15 | 4,318 | |
1996 | 13 | 4,703 | |
1995 | 15 | 4,128 | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | 21 | 3,180 | |
1992 | 10 | 5,375 | |
1991 | 15 | 3,880 | |
1990 | 12 | 4,499 | |
1989 | 12 | 4,365 | |
1988 | 11 | 4,276 | |
1987 | 9 | 4,693 | |
1986 | 7 | 5,538 | |
1985 | 13 | 3,479 | |
1984 | 11 | 3,787 | |
1983 | 15 | 2,964 | |
1982 | 7 | 5,220 | |
1981 | 9 | 4,279 | |
1980 | 9 | 4,267 | |
1979 | 15 | 2,942 | |
1978 | 8 | 4,292 | |
1977 | 7 | 4,776 | |
1976 | 15 | 2,746 | |
1975 | 11 | 3,313 | |
1974 | 9 | 3,656 | |
1973 | 7 | 4,237 | |
1972 | 18 | 2,190 | |
1971 | 10 | 3,228 | |
1970 | 12 | 2,781 | |
1969 | 5 | 4,633 | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | 8 | 3,073 | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | 9 | 2,931 | |
1963 | 6 | 3,780 | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | 5 | 4,284 | |
1960 | 5 | 4,250 | |
1959 | 6 | 3,744 | |
1958 | 8 | 3,131 | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | 9 | 2,859 | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | 8 | 3,035 | |
1953 | 6 | 3,570 | |
1952 | 7 | 3,205 | |
1951 | 5 | 3,908 | |
1950 | 7 | 3,146 | |
1949 | 7 | 3,119 | |
1948 | 7 | 3,117 | |
1947 | 6 | 3,500 | |
1946 | 6 | 3,305 | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | 7 | 3,065 | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | 6 | 3,283 | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | 7 | 2,948 | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | 6 | 3,307 | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | 5 | 3,888 | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | 9 | 2,716 | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | 6 | 3,749 | |
1929 | 12 | 2,379 | |
1928 | 8 | 3,193 | |
1927 | 9 | 2,998 | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | 7 | 3,537 | |
1924 | 8 | 3,349 | |
1923 | 6 | 3,979 | |
1922 | 5 | 4,559 | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |