Gaetana Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Gaetana?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Gaetana would be a striking name choice.
Position 1420, its highest popularity RANKING, was reached in 1915.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 1923 with 27 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Gaetana was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Approximately during the years 1912-1915 the name Gaetana took a definitive turn upwards in popularity.
The popularity trend for Gaetana has remained mostly unchanged for a while. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Gaetana for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Gaetana?
Currently, the name is at a very low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Gaetana is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Gaetana (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | 5 | 18,434 | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | 5 | 14,003 | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | 6 | 11,297 | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | 6 | 9,405 | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | 6 | 8,793 | |
1976 | 5 | 9,762 | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | 6 | 7,735 | |
1972 | 9 | 5,622 | |
1971 | 6 | 7,685 | |
1970 | 5 | 8,396 | |
1969 | 6 | 6,895 | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | 7 | 5,651 | |
1966 | 7 | 5,439 | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | 11 | 4,182 | |
1963 | 5 | 6,943 | |
1962 | 8 | 5,005 | |
1961 | 11 | 4,094 | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | 7 | 5,210 | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | 5 | 6,393 | |
1956 | 6 | 5,502 | |
1955 | 8 | 4,508 | |
1954 | 8 | 4,396 | |
1953 | 13 | 3,172 | |
1952 | 13 | 3,088 | |
1951 | 5 | 5,688 | |
1950 | 7 | 4,458 | |
1949 | 8 | 3,998 | |
1948 | 8 | 3,990 | |
1947 | 5 | 5,589 | |
1946 | 7 | 4,138 | |
1945 | 5 | 4,784 | |
1944 | 8 | 3,489 | |
1943 | 8 | 3,603 | |
1942 | 10 | 3,060 | |
1941 | 8 | 3,355 | |
1940 | 7 | 3,625 | |
1939 | 6 | 3,934 | |
1938 | 7 | 3,612 | |
1937 | 10 | 2,806 | |
1936 | 5 | 4,444 | |
1935 | 9 | 3,010 | |
1934 | 5 | 4,519 | |
1933 | 10 | 2,751 | |
1932 | 7 | 3,702 | |
1931 | 10 | 2,846 | |
1930 | 10 | 2,927 | |
1929 | 17 | 2,039 | |
1928 | 7 | 3,924 | |
1927 | 18 | 2,128 | |
1926 | 21 | 1,900 | |
1925 | 18 | 2,141 | |
1924 | 15 | 2,453 | |
1923 | 27 | 1,608 | |
1922 | 24 | 1,748 | |
1921 | 13 | 2,685 | |
1920 | 20 | 1,979 | |
1919 | 18 | 2,014 | |
1918 | 15 | 2,314 | |
1917 | 21 | 1,736 | |
1916 | 14 | 2,299 | |
1915 | 26 | 1,420 | |
1914 | 14 | 1,849 | |
1913 | 13 | 1,706 | |
1912 | 9 | 2,038 | |
1911 | 6 | 2,297 | |
1910 | 9 | 1,683 | |
1909 | 5 | 2,339 | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | 5 | 1,994 | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |