Ervine Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Ervine?
Less than 5 babies were given the name Ervine in the United States in 2018.Ervine, is a possible choice for parents seeking a more unique name.
Its highest popularity ranking of #2299 was reached in 1918 with 13 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Ervine in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Where is the name Ervine popularity headed?
Overall, when compared to its most prominent year, the name's popularity is at a low point.
For a number of years, the name Ervine has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Ervine has remained about the same.
The name Ervine is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
for Percentages.| Ervine (Boy) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
| 2018 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2017 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2016 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2015 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2014 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2013 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2012 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2011 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2010 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2009 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2008 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2007 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2006 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2005 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2004 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2003 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2002 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2001 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2000 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1999 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1998 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1997 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1996 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1995 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1994 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1993 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1992 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1991 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1990 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1989 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1988 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1987 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1986 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1985 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1984 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1983 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1982 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1981 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1980 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1979 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1978 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1977 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1976 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1975 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1974 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1973 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1972 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1971 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1970 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1969 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1968 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1967 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1966 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1965 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1964 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1963 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1962 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1961 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1960 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1959 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1958 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1957 | | 5 | 4,163 |
| 1956 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1955 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1954 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1953 | | 6 | 3,543 |
| 1952 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1951 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1950 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1949 | | 5 | 3,853 |
| 1948 | | 5 | 3,844 |
| 1947 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1946 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1945 | | 6 | 3,104 |
| 1944 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1943 | | 5 | 3,698 |
| 1942 | | 5 | 3,732 |
| 1941 | | 5 | 3,659 |
| 1940 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1939 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1938 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1937 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1936 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1935 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1934 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1933 | | 6 | 3,396 |
| 1932 | | 6 | 3,498 |
| 1931 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1930 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1929 | | 7 | 3,340 |
| 1928 | | 7 | 3,473 |
| 1927 | | 8 | 3,244 |
| 1926 | | 5 | 4,416 |
| 1925 | | 7 | 3,514 |
| 1924 | | 7 | 3,620 |
| 1923 | | 7 | 3,583 |
| 1922 | | 7 | 3,633 |
| 1921 | | 8 | 3,300 |
| 1920 | | 9 | 3,037 |
| 1919 | | 7 | 3,527 |
| 1918 | | 13 | 2,299 |
| 1917 | | 9 | 2,807 |
| 1916 | | 7 | 3,286 |
| 1915 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1914 | | 5 | 3,415 |
| 1913 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1912 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1911 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1910 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1909 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1908 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1907 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1906 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1905 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1904 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1903 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1902 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1901 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1900 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1899 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1898 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1897 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1896 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1895 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1894 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1893 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1892 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1891 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1890 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1889 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1888 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1887 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1886 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1885 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1884 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1883 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1882 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1881 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1880 | | < 5 | -- |