Deiondre Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Deiondre?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Deiondre would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity ranking of #1,878 in 1996 with 48 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Deiondre in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Deiondre, decisively moved upwards in popularity around the years 1992-1996, whereas clearly downward trends happened around 2010-2013.
Deiondre's popularity has been spiralling downward for some time. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Deiondre has dropped significantly.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Deiondre?
Deiondre's popularity is at a very low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Deiondre is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Relative to what it once was, Deiondre has fallen out of favor as a given name.
Deiondre (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | 7 | 9,893 | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | 7 | 9,869 | |
2013 | 11 | 7,135 | |
2012 | 10 | 7,667 | |
2011 | 11 | 7,105 | |
2010 | 16 | 5,535 | |
2009 | 19 | 4,965 | |
2008 | 10 | 7,820 | |
2007 | 19 | 4,851 | |
2006 | 19 | 4,719 | |
2005 | 15 | 5,351 | |
2004 | 26 | 3,552 | |
2003 | 19 | 4,317 | |
2002 | 18 | 4,354 | |
2001 | 21 | 3,873 | |
2000 | 15 | 4,840 | |
1999 | 19 | 3,870 | |
1998 | 18 | 3,880 | |
1997 | 25 | 3,000 | |
1996 | 48 | 1,878 | |
1995 | 35 | 2,259 | |
1994 | 16 | 3,958 | |
1993 | 17 | 3,695 | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |