Annick Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Annick?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Annick would be a striking name choice.
Position 4637, its highest popularity RANKING, was reached in 1967.
But, the greatest number of babies were given the name in 1990 with 11 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Annick in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
The popularity trend for Annick has been moving downward for a while. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Annick has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Annick?
Annick's popularity is at a mid point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Annick is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Annick (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | 6 | 14,726 | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | 8 | 12,385 | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | 5 | 16,716 | |
2004 | 5 | 16,329 | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | 7 | 12,195 | |
2000 | 6 | 13,298 | |
1999 | 7 | 11,491 | |
1998 | 6 | 12,571 | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | 5 | 13,565 | |
1994 | 9 | 8,854 | |
1993 | 6 | 11,883 | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | 11 | 7,334 | |
1989 | 5 | 12,490 | |
1988 | 8 | 8,430 | |
1987 | 10 | 6,816 | |
1986 | 5 | 10,998 | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | 5 | 10,510 | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | 6 | 8,495 | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | 5 | 9,148 | |
1974 | 6 | 7,737 | |
1973 | 5 | 8,488 | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | 8 | 5,840 | |
1969 | 6 | 6,657 | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | 9 | 4,637 | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | 5 | 6,578 | |
1964 | 5 | 6,816 | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |