Anjela Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Anjela?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Anjela would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity RANKING of #4253 was reached in 1970.
But, the greatest number of babies were given the name in 2005 with 31 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Anjela was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Anjela, decisively moved upwards in popularity around the years 1998-2001, and 2002-2005, whereas unequivocal downward movement occurred about 1994-1997, and 2005-2008.
For a number of years, the name Anjela has been moving downward in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Anjela for their newborn has dropped.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Anjela?
Anjela's popularity is at a very low point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Anjela is mostly unused and will probably continue to drift downward in popularity.
Anjela (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | 7 | 12,800 | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | 8 | 12,010 | |
2013 | 5 | 16,769 | |
2012 | 5 | 17,106 | |
2011 | 11 | 9,776 | |
2010 | 9 | 11,332 | |
2009 | 15 | 8,087 | |
2008 | 12 | 9,533 | |
2007 | 17 | 7,413 | |
2006 | 18 | 6,879 | |
2005 | 31 | 4,379 | |
2004 | 15 | 7,424 | |
2003 | 19 | 6,075 | |
2002 | 17 | 6,419 | |
2001 | 18 | 6,090 | |
2000 | 14 | 7,196 | |
1999 | 14 | 6,856 | |
1998 | 6 | 12,559 | |
1997 | 13 | 6,874 | |
1996 | 14 | 6,421 | |
1995 | 14 | 6,280 | |
1994 | 19 | 5,030 | |
1993 | 17 | 5,434 | |
1992 | 15 | 6,029 | |
1991 | 10 | 8,017 | |
1990 | 17 | 5,306 | |
1989 | 12 | 6,558 | |
1988 | 8 | 8,425 | |
1987 | 6 | 9,907 | |
1986 | 11 | 6,182 | |
1985 | 9 | 6,981 | |
1984 | 5 | 10,504 | |
1983 | 12 | 5,472 | |
1982 | 15 | 4,728 | |
1981 | 10 | 6,353 | |
1980 | 13 | 5,255 | |
1979 | 7 | 8,086 | |
1978 | 10 | 5,983 | |
1977 | 15 | 4,439 | |
1976 | 8 | 6,644 | |
1975 | 7 | 7,203 | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | 8 | 6,112 | |
1972 | 7 | 6,590 | |
1971 | 9 | 5,565 | |
1970 | 13 | 4,253 | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | 6 | 6,283 | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | 6 | 6,026 | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |