Amol Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Amol?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Amol would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity ranking of #3,289 in 1982 with 13 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Amol in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Amol's popularity has steadily decreased for some time. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Amol has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Amol?
Currently, the name is at a low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Amol is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
for Percentages.| Amol (Boy) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
| 2018 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2017 | | 5 | 12,328 |
| 2016 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2015 | | 5 | 12,168 |
| 2014 | | 5 | 12,189 |
| 2013 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2012 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2011 | | 6 | 10,874 |
| 2010 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2009 | | 5 | 12,587 |
| 2008 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2007 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2006 | | < 5 | -- |
| 2005 | | 6 | 10,198 |
| 2004 | | 6 | 10,002 |
| 2003 | | 11 | 6,275 |
| 2002 | | 6 | 9,447 |
| 2001 | | 7 | 8,379 |
| 2000 | | 8 | 7,459 |
| 1999 | | 5 | 9,981 |
| 1998 | | 8 | 6,872 |
| 1997 | | 7 | 7,309 |
| 1996 | | 10 | 5,550 |
| 1995 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1994 | | 6 | 7,814 |
| 1993 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1992 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1991 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1990 | | 8 | 5,847 |
| 1989 | | 5 | 7,957 |
| 1988 | | 7 | 5,772 |
| 1987 | | 11 | 3,972 |
| 1986 | | 7 | 5,352 |
| 1985 | | 9 | 4,344 |
| 1984 | | 8 | 4,572 |
| 1983 | | 7 | 4,937 |
| 1982 | | 13 | 3,289 |
| 1981 | | 8 | 4,526 |
| 1980 | | 11 | 3,623 |
| 1979 | | 12 | 3,362 |
| 1978 | | 10 | 3,622 |
| 1977 | | 10 | 3,619 |
| 1976 | | 5 | 5,618 |
| 1975 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1974 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1973 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1972 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1971 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1970 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1969 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1968 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1967 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1966 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1965 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1964 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1963 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1962 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1961 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1960 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1959 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1958 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1957 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1956 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1955 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1954 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1953 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1952 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1951 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1950 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1949 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1948 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1947 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1946 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1945 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1944 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1943 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1942 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1941 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1940 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1939 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1938 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1937 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1936 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1935 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1934 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1933 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1932 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1931 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1930 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1929 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1928 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1927 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1926 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1925 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1924 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1923 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1922 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1921 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1920 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1919 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1918 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1917 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1916 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1915 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1914 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1913 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1912 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1911 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1910 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1909 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1908 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1907 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1906 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1905 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1904 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1903 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1902 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1901 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1900 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1899 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1898 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1897 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1896 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1895 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1894 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1893 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1892 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1891 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1890 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1889 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1888 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1887 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1886 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1885 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1884 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1883 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1882 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1881 | | < 5 | -- |
| 1880 | | < 5 | -- |