Ambra Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Ambra?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Ambra would be a striking name choice.
Position 1768, its highest popularity ranking, was reached in 1981 with 63 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Ambra in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Approximately during the years 1974-1981, the name Ambra took a definitive turn upwards in popularity whereas clearly downward trends happened around 1992-1995.
The popularity trend for Ambra has been moving downward for a while. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Ambra has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Ambra?
Currently, the name is at a very low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Ambra is mostly unused and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Relative to what it once was, Ambra has fallen out of favor as a given name.
Ambra (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | 5 | 16,560 | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | 5 | 17,036 | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | 7 | 13,804 | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | 7 | 13,683 | |
2005 | 7 | 13,102 | |
2004 | 5 | 16,255 | |
2003 | 5 | 15,918 | |
2002 | 7 | 12,268 | |
2001 | 10 | 9,398 | |
2000 | 10 | 9,204 | |
1999 | 9 | 9,526 | |
1998 | 5 | 14,256 | |
1997 | 14 | 6,502 | |
1996 | 9 | 8,851 | |
1995 | 23 | 4,352 | |
1994 | 29 | 3,708 | |
1993 | 32 | 3,425 | |
1992 | 37 | 3,092 | |
1991 | 32 | 3,373 | |
1990 | 33 | 3,299 | |
1989 | 41 | 2,717 | |
1988 | 37 | 2,805 | |
1987 | 38 | 2,614 | |
1986 | 37 | 2,623 | |
1985 | 41 | 2,400 | |
1984 | 36 | 2,577 | |
1983 | 36 | 2,517 | |
1982 | 44 | 2,250 | |
1981 | 63 | 1,768 | |
1980 | 35 | 2,652 | |
1979 | 33 | 2,679 | |
1978 | 22 | 3,389 | |
1977 | 19 | 3,767 | |
1976 | 18 | 3,681 | |
1975 | 16 | 3,954 | |
1974 | 9 | 5,785 | |
1973 | 11 | 4,880 | |
1972 | 11 | 4,801 | |
1971 | 8 | 6,019 | |
1970 | 5 | 8,019 | |
1969 | 5 | 7,498 | |
1968 | 7 | 5,653 | |
1967 | 5 | 6,825 | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | 6 | 5,905 | |
1962 | 6 | 5,866 | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | 5 | 6,120 | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | 7 | 4,488 | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |