Rayner Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Rayner?
Ranking 5,442nd in popularity in the United States for boys in 2018, the name Rayner is rare.Rayner, would be a stand out, distinctive name selection.
Its highest popularity RANKING of #2822 was reached in 1940.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 2016 with 17 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Rayner was less than 5, most recently in 2004.
Approximately during the years 2012-2015 the name Rayner took a definitive turn upwards in popularity.
Currently, the name is at or near its highest point when compared to its most popular year.
How popular will Rayner be?
For a number of years, the name Rayner has been soaring upward in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Rayner for their newborn has risen.
The name Rayner is mostly unused but will probably continue to rise upward in popularity.
Rayner (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 17 | 5,442 | |
2017 | 15 | 5,989 | |
2016 | 17 | 5,484 | |
2015 | 16 | 5,668 | |
2014 | 14 | 6,223 | |
2013 | 13 | 6,519 | |
2012 | 9 | 8,712 | |
2011 | 9 | 8,606 | |
2010 | 12 | 6,997 | |
2009 | 8 | 9,665 | |
2008 | 9 | 8,849 | |
2007 | 11 | 7,464 | |
2006 | 5 | 13,562 | |
2005 | 7 | 9,891 | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | < 5 | -- | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | 6 | 8,227 | |
1991 | 5 | 9,294 | |
1990 | 7 | 6,994 | |
1989 | 6 | 7,689 | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | < 5 | -- | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | < 5 | -- | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | 7 | 3,855 | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | 6 | 3,931 | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | 5 | 4,446 | |
1958 | 6 | 3,847 | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | 5 | 4,269 | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | 6 | 3,662 | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | 5 | 3,897 | |
1940 | 8 | 2,822 | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | 5 | 4,672 | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |