What's New
Fact of the Week
Pepe Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Pepe?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Pepe would be a striking name choice.
Its highest popularity ranking of #2634 was reached in 1962 with 11 occurrences.
In any year, the least number of babies named Pepe was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
For a number of years, the name Pepe has remained mostly unchanged in popularity. Of late, continuing the trend, the number of parents selecting the name Pepe for their newborn has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Pepe?
Pepe's popularity is at a mid point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Pepe is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Pepe (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | 5 | 11,998 | |
2001 | 6 | 10,203 | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | 7 | 8,480 | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | < 5 | -- | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | < 5 | -- | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | < 5 | -- | |
1982 | 8 | 4,885 | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | 6 | 5,868 | |
1978 | 10 | 3,781 | |
1977 | 5 | 6,582 | |
1976 | < 5 | -- | |
1975 | 9 | 3,865 | |
1974 | 6 | 5,078 | |
1973 | 5 | 5,676 | |
1972 | 7 | 4,320 | |
1971 | 5 | 5,461 | |
1970 | 10 | 3,222 | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | 7 | 3,591 | |
1967 | 8 | 3,172 | |
1966 | 5 | 4,368 | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | 10 | 2,806 | |
1962 | 11 | 2,634 | |
1961 | 8 | 3,284 | |
1960 | 6 | 3,956 | |
1959 | 6 | 3,894 | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | 5 | 4,405 | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |