Marlis Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Marlis?
Mostly unused in the United States, less than 5 babies were bestowed the name in 2018.Uncommon, Marlis would be a striking name choice.
It reached its highest popularity RANKING of #1,306 in 1938.
Nonetheless, the name was given to the greatest number of children in 1941 with 33 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Marlis in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 2018.
Approximately during the years 1929-1934 the name Marlis took a definitive turn upwards in popularity.
Marlis's popularity has remained mostly unchanged for some time. In recent years, continuing the trend, the number of babies given the name Marlis has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Marlis?
Currently, the name is at a very low point when compared to its most popular year.
The name Marlis is mostly unused and will probably continue to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Marlis (Girl) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | < 5 | -- | |
2017 | < 5 | -- | |
2016 | < 5 | -- | |
2015 | < 5 | -- | |
2014 | < 5 | -- | |
2013 | < 5 | -- | |
2012 | < 5 | -- | |
2011 | < 5 | -- | |
2010 | < 5 | -- | |
2009 | < 5 | -- | |
2008 | < 5 | -- | |
2007 | < 5 | -- | |
2006 | < 5 | -- | |
2005 | < 5 | -- | |
2004 | < 5 | -- | |
2003 | < 5 | -- | |
2002 | < 5 | -- | |
2001 | 5 | 16,974 | |
2000 | < 5 | -- | |
1999 | < 5 | -- | |
1998 | < 5 | -- | |
1997 | < 5 | -- | |
1996 | < 5 | -- | |
1995 | < 5 | -- | |
1994 | < 5 | -- | |
1993 | < 5 | -- | |
1992 | < 5 | -- | |
1991 | < 5 | -- | |
1990 | < 5 | -- | |
1989 | < 5 | -- | |
1988 | 7 | 9,938 | |
1987 | < 5 | -- | |
1986 | 6 | 10,354 | |
1985 | < 5 | -- | |
1984 | < 5 | -- | |
1983 | 5 | 11,304 | |
1982 | < 5 | -- | |
1981 | < 5 | -- | |
1980 | < 5 | -- | |
1979 | < 5 | -- | |
1978 | < 5 | -- | |
1977 | < 5 | -- | |
1976 | 8 | 7,015 | |
1975 | < 5 | -- | |
1974 | 7 | 7,373 | |
1973 | < 5 | -- | |
1972 | < 5 | -- | |
1971 | 6 | 7,951 | |
1970 | 8 | 6,141 | |
1969 | 5 | 8,200 | |
1968 | 9 | 5,012 | |
1967 | 6 | 6,515 | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | 10 | 4,392 | |
1964 | 13 | 3,818 | |
1963 | 11 | 4,173 | |
1962 | 6 | 6,314 | |
1961 | 9 | 4,764 | |
1960 | 6 | 6,134 | |
1959 | 12 | 3,746 | |
1958 | 19 | 2,719 | |
1957 | 14 | 3,247 | |
1956 | 21 | 2,508 | |
1955 | 18 | 2,687 | |
1954 | 28 | 2,010 | |
1953 | 22 | 2,275 | |
1952 | 25 | 2,057 | |
1951 | 13 | 3,049 | |
1950 | 15 | 2,733 | |
1949 | 24 | 1,998 | |
1948 | 17 | 2,462 | |
1947 | 23 | 2,072 | |
1946 | 26 | 1,796 | |
1945 | 16 | 2,207 | |
1944 | 22 | 1,844 | |
1943 | 23 | 1,816 | |
1942 | 28 | 1,581 | |
1941 | 33 | 1,350 | |
1940 | 32 | 1,336 | |
1939 | 27 | 1,456 | |
1938 | 32 | 1,306 | |
1937 | 17 | 1,970 | |
1936 | 27 | 1,434 | |
1935 | 18 | 1,892 | |
1934 | 29 | 1,366 | |
1933 | 13 | 2,358 | |
1932 | 19 | 1,857 | |
1931 | 14 | 2,267 | |
1930 | 11 | 2,799 | |
1929 | 5 | 5,028 | |
1928 | 15 | 2,343 | |
1927 | 13 | 2,649 | |
1926 | 6 | 4,653 | |
1925 | 13 | 2,721 | |
1924 | 5 | 5,591 | |
1923 | 6 | 4,765 | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | 5 | 5,617 | |
1920 | 8 | 3,833 | |
1919 | 5 | 5,293 | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |