Deacon Name Popularity
Charts | Table | About | By Year
How popular is Deacon?
In 2018 the somewhat popular name Deacon, ranked the 486th Most Popular Boys Name in the United States.Presently one of the top 500 most popular, Deacon has been less popular than the top 1000 in the past.
Its highest popularity ranking of #420 was reached in 2014 with 734 occurrences.
The least amount of newborns dubbed Deacon in any given year was less than 5, most recently in 1970.
Deacon, decisively moved upwards in popularity around the years 1973-1976, 1992-2007, and 2010-2014.
For a number of years, the name Deacon has been soaring upward in popularity. In recent years however, the number of babies given the name Deacon has remained about the same.
What does the future hold for the popularity of Deacon?
Deacon's popularity is at a very high point when measured against its most notable year.
The name Deacon still has a solid footing and has recently started to plateu at its present level but may also begin to make a more decisive move up or down.
Deacon (Boy) | |||
---|---|---|---|
Year | % | No. of Babies Given Name | Popul. Rank |
2018 | 599 | 486 | |
2017 | 575 | 503 | |
2016 | 651 | 468 | |
2015 | 667 | 453 | |
2014 | 734 | 420 | |
2013 | 655 | 439 | |
2012 | 353 | 667 | |
2011 | 358 | 655 | |
2010 | 336 | 693 | |
2009 | 352 | 688 | |
2008 | 380 | 645 | |
2007 | 386 | 629 | |
2006 | 325 | 690 | |
2005 | 240 | 801 | |
2004 | 192 | 900 | |
2003 | 127 | 1,177 | |
2002 | 142 | 1,065 | |
2001 | 126 | 1,118 | |
2000 | 74 | 1,586 | |
1999 | 46 | 2,070 | |
1998 | 13 | 4,944 | |
1997 | 15 | 4,290 | |
1996 | 15 | 4,224 | |
1995 | 10 | 5,586 | |
1994 | 11 | 5,175 | |
1993 | 11 | 5,080 | |
1992 | 6 | 7,659 | |
1991 | 10 | 5,180 | |
1990 | 5 | 8,403 | |
1989 | 6 | 7,181 | |
1988 | 8 | 5,305 | |
1987 | 7 | 5,625 | |
1986 | 7 | 5,459 | |
1985 | 10 | 4,118 | |
1984 | 11 | 3,761 | |
1983 | 8 | 4,595 | |
1982 | 6 | 5,807 | |
1981 | 14 | 3,070 | |
1980 | 10 | 3,905 | |
1979 | 11 | 3,620 | |
1978 | 15 | 2,825 | |
1977 | 10 | 3,666 | |
1976 | 16 | 2,632 | |
1975 | 14 | 2,789 | |
1974 | 12 | 2,987 | |
1973 | 8 | 3,784 | |
1972 | 6 | 4,555 | |
1971 | 15 | 2,477 | |
1970 | < 5 | -- | |
1969 | < 5 | -- | |
1968 | < 5 | -- | |
1967 | < 5 | -- | |
1966 | < 5 | -- | |
1965 | < 5 | -- | |
1964 | < 5 | -- | |
1963 | < 5 | -- | |
1962 | < 5 | -- | |
1961 | < 5 | -- | |
1960 | < 5 | -- | |
1959 | < 5 | -- | |
1958 | < 5 | -- | |
1957 | < 5 | -- | |
1956 | < 5 | -- | |
1955 | < 5 | -- | |
1954 | < 5 | -- | |
1953 | < 5 | -- | |
1952 | < 5 | -- | |
1951 | < 5 | -- | |
1950 | < 5 | -- | |
1949 | < 5 | -- | |
1948 | < 5 | -- | |
1947 | < 5 | -- | |
1946 | < 5 | -- | |
1945 | < 5 | -- | |
1944 | < 5 | -- | |
1943 | < 5 | -- | |
1942 | < 5 | -- | |
1941 | < 5 | -- | |
1940 | < 5 | -- | |
1939 | < 5 | -- | |
1938 | < 5 | -- | |
1937 | < 5 | -- | |
1936 | < 5 | -- | |
1935 | < 5 | -- | |
1934 | < 5 | -- | |
1933 | < 5 | -- | |
1932 | < 5 | -- | |
1931 | < 5 | -- | |
1930 | < 5 | -- | |
1929 | < 5 | -- | |
1928 | < 5 | -- | |
1927 | < 5 | -- | |
1926 | < 5 | -- | |
1925 | < 5 | -- | |
1924 | < 5 | -- | |
1923 | < 5 | -- | |
1922 | < 5 | -- | |
1921 | < 5 | -- | |
1920 | < 5 | -- | |
1919 | < 5 | -- | |
1918 | < 5 | -- | |
1917 | < 5 | -- | |
1916 | < 5 | -- | |
1915 | < 5 | -- | |
1914 | < 5 | -- | |
1913 | < 5 | -- | |
1912 | < 5 | -- | |
1911 | < 5 | -- | |
1910 | < 5 | -- | |
1909 | < 5 | -- | |
1908 | < 5 | -- | |
1907 | < 5 | -- | |
1906 | < 5 | -- | |
1905 | < 5 | -- | |
1904 | < 5 | -- | |
1903 | < 5 | -- | |
1902 | < 5 | -- | |
1901 | < 5 | -- | |
1900 | < 5 | -- | |
1899 | < 5 | -- | |
1898 | < 5 | -- | |
1897 | < 5 | -- | |
1896 | < 5 | -- | |
1895 | < 5 | -- | |
1894 | < 5 | -- | |
1893 | < 5 | -- | |
1892 | < 5 | -- | |
1891 | < 5 | -- | |
1890 | < 5 | -- | |
1889 | < 5 | -- | |
1888 | < 5 | -- | |
1887 | < 5 | -- | |
1886 | < 5 | -- | |
1885 | < 5 | -- | |
1884 | < 5 | -- | |
1883 | < 5 | -- | |
1882 | < 5 | -- | |
1881 | < 5 | -- | |
1880 | < 5 | -- |